Milwaukee Bucks: 5 reasons D.J. Wilson was a bad pick
4. Skill-set doesn’t equal production
Head coach Jason Kidd has a player type he goes after: long and athletic with defensive upside and offensive room to grow. With general manager Jon Horst taking over the front office, it seems that he will continue the trend as he made the call to take D.J. Wilson in the first round.
Wilson fits the archetype on paper, with plenty of length and a season of highlight blocks to his name. The problem is that Wilson played in a very different system at Michigan, and the success he found both may not be translatable and may be out of reach. One season of above average play does not guarantee more growth.
Drafting a player with a certain skill-set does not always work out smoothly, either. Rashad Vaughn fits the Milwaukee mold perfectly on paper, with his combination of length, shooting and ball-handling. The problem is that when Vaughn hits the court it becomes apparent he doesn’t have the efficiency to be relied upon as a shooter nor the defensive acumen to hang with other professionals. Right skill-set, poor production.
Matthew Dellavedova fit the bill to a T in free agency last season. By signing the Australian point guard to an extended contract, the Bucks added a player who can guard 1s and 2s and knock down an outside shot. But the academic fact is that while he does both of those fairly well, he does neither at an elite level outside of the warm ecosystem of a LeBron James team, and doesn’t bring enough else to the table to be a reliable starter.
Whether D.J. Wilson grows into his bio on paper is yet to be seen. But for a player with so little high-level film, any signs that a player isn’t fully the player he is expected to be is troubling.