The Brooklyn Nets rejected the Los Angeles Clippers' sign-and-trade offer for Paul Pierce. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

Brooklyn Nets: Clips Can't Handle 'The Truth'


The Brooklyn Nets recently turned down a sign-and-trade opportunity proposed by the Los Angeles Clippers. L.A offered Brooklyn’s choice of Matt Barnes, Jared Dudley, or Reggie Bullock in exchange for Nets’ veteran forward Paul Pierce.

Brooklyn is demanding either sharpshooter J.J. Redick or a future first-round pick in return for Pierce, who’s currently an unrestricted free agent. Because of their lack of cap space, the Clippers can’t afford to simply go after Pierce on the open market, making a sign-and-trade necessary.

However, L.A. has just used its mid-level exception to sign stretch big man Spencer Hawes, which means sending Pierce to the Clippers seems even less likely now.

Was this the right decision by L.A.? I don’t think so.

The Clippers need a starting small forward. Badly.

Neither Matt Barnes nor Jared Dudley are legitimate enough starters for a team trying to win the wildly competitive Western Conference. Additionally, L.A. could use an experienced, clutch performer to help them go deep in the playoffs after being bounced out in the second-round or earlier in each of the past three seasons.

This was their chance to acquire the perfect fit in Paul Pierce.

As I detailed in a previous article, Pierce was the Nets’ most important player in their first round, seven-game playoff series victory over Toronto. He hit a game-winner in Game 1, and had a series-saving block to deflate the Raptors’ hopes in the final seconds of Game 7.

Sure, he’s getting older, declining a bit. And sure, his game isn’t quite the same as it used to be.

But “The Truth” is still a knockdown shooter, a solid team defender, and, most importantly, clutch.

If all that wasn’t enough, there’s the obvious Doc Rivers-Paul Pierce connection that would be rekindled with the acquisition of Pierce by the Clippers.

Not to mention, Pierce is from southern California.

With all this lined up and working in their favor, I really think L.A. shouldn’t give up so easily on their attempt to sign-and-trade for Pierce. Nevertheless, it’s not the end of the world for the Clippers if they don’t eventually land the former Celtics’ star; they’re still one of the best teams in the league.

Although even more questions, regrets, and doubts will come at them with full force next year if they fail to make the Western Conference Finals yet again.

If Paul Pierce were to go to the L.A. Clippers, he'd be reunited with his former coach in Boston, Doc Rivers. Mandatory Credit: Mark L. Baer-USA TODAY Sports

If Paul Pierce were to go to the L.A. Clippers, he’d be reunited with his former coach in Boston, Doc Rivers. Mandatory Credit: Mark L. Baer-USA TODAY Sports

Was this the right decision by Brooklyn? There haven’t been many chances to say this about Nets management lately, but … yes. Good call.

Sending away Pierce in return for merely an average role player would be a huge mistake by the Nets, even if it means losing the chance to cut salary. If they do indeed decide to part ways with Pierce, Brooklyn needs real value in return.

So, what does it tell us if Brooklyn’s not simply willing to relinquish Paul Pierce for nothing? With one more season of Kevin Garnett, Andrei Kirilenko, and Brook Lopez under contract, the Nets could be planning to go all in for one last year with their current core group, before starting to retool and get younger next summer.

Looks like Brooklyn isn’t in money-saving, thinking-about-the-future mode, just yet. They’re still in the “win now” mindset.

How much winning, exactly? That remains to be seen.

Tags: Brooklyn Nets Paul Pierce

  • Milan Dudley

    This blogger doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Barnes isn’t a legitimate starter? Pierce might be an upgrade offensively but defensively Barnes is a much better player. Besides Pierce is an UNrestricted free agent. Meaning Pierce can walk and leave the Nets empty handed. That fact is offense is no the Clippers problem, they have plenty of scorers. They needed to be able to guard Westbrook and Durant and they needed Blake to significantly “out play” Serge and that didn’t happen. So before you go disrespecting Barnes and Dudley go do your homework Kahlil.

    • Kahlil Maskati

      Are you related to Jared Dudley? That would be cool.

      No disrespect to Matt Barnes; all I’m saying is Pierce would be a clear upgrade. Barnes may be a bit better defensively, but I don’t see him as an indispensable lock-down defender/Tony Allen type guy who can’t be replaced. Pierce is by no means a quick fix for the Clippers, I understand. What LAC really needs most right now are some backup defensive bigs. However, that 3-slot for them was very shaky/inconsistent in the playoffs last year…and the playoffs is when Paul Pierce is at his best.